Café—Stirring the Spirit Within Hot Topic Coffee Talk Tip Jar Internet Café
   


My Feminism
by Emilie Rommel

My friend Justin wears a bright purple shirt with white lettering on it that reads, "This is what a feminist look like." He bought it as part of a promotional fundraiser for Eve Ensler’s The Vagina Monologues, a play about female sexuality that was performed at our small, Lutheran, liberal arts college. All right, so, if a feminist looks like a skinny, 6-foot 5-inch cyclist with xy chromosomes, it could look like just about anyone — right?

Feminism is a tough concept to convey. It’s not a simple, descriptive word (was it ever?), but a philosophical and cultural ideal saddled with many, mostly unflattering, stereotypes. And feminism is still largely a new idea — so new that many of the key players who gave it a name and shape are still very much alive.

When I was first introduced to feminism, I thought of a dozen women — historic figures, celebrities, and family members — as definitions of what I understood a feminist to be. They were smart, determined women, struggling with June Cleaver stereotypes and a limiting, patriarchal culture. All they wanted was to fulfill their personal and professional ambitions in a more equal world. I saw myself as a sister advocate, and my friends and I were very aware of which teachers called only on boys in the classroom. I recall becoming angry when women were defined as innately suited for housework and mothering.

I am 23 now, and my understanding of feminism has evolved. I understand it to mean equal footing with men in the areas of pay, promotion, and a promising future. Feminism today means that women can have ambition and acceptance. Feminists are the women at church, behind the surgeons’ masks, and running corporations. They are women whose past directly affects our future — whether it be in our families, workplace, or school.

Generation Gaps
My mother was 23 and married with five children when she witnessed the sexual revolution in the 1960s. Five years earlier, she turned down a full university scholarship because her father told her, “Girls don’t need college.” Across the country and only a few years later, my best friend’s mother accepted a full-ride scholarship to a university because college administrators decided that colleges needed girls.

Women of my generation may have a hard time understanding the many “glass ceilings” that existed for women years ago. And when it comes to the entire library of stories, plays, poems, and doctoral theses written by and about these women, we know to appreciate their struggles. However, there is still a communication chasm between my generation and theirs. Some women in years past — indelicately labeled “bra-burning feminists” — dedicated their whole lives to ensuring that this generation would not face the same judgments and restrictions they did. But without having experienced the same opposition to female equality that these women did, will my generation ever truly understand their battle? Can we connect to the women who paved the way for us to have a better life?

My 24-year-old former college roommate, Anne, answers yes to those questions without hesitation. It may be our mothers’ generation who struggled, but “we were raised by our mothers,” she says. "For the most part, our upbringings have been directly affected by our mothers’ reactions to their own [rearing]."

I see Anne’s point. Though many young women may not recognize it, we are tied to the feminist battles our mothers and grandmothers fought. Those women before us who fought for equality may radiate enlightenment, but they were trained, supervised, and scrutinized by a patriarchal culture. Through it all, these women learned and grew, and they are training us. It’s a trickle-down effect.

But will the trickle-down flow stop with us? Is it possible to become so accustomed to a more equal system that we forget the work that went into creating and maintaining it to begin with? From the time I was five years old, my parents told me I would have the opportunity to go to college, no matter what their sacrifice. With help from my parents and extensive student loans, I did get to college, and I knew they were proud, especially my mother, who wanted her daughter to have the opportunities she missed 40 years earlier. (I knew all of that, but by my sophomore year I still routinely slept through my early morning literature class and barely passed philosophy.)

How many roads….
For anyone like me, who has ever taken their hard-won (by someone else) privileges for granted, an even greater concern exists. Not only are we dishonoring our foremothers’ work by taking them for granted, but we are effectively putting our own rights at risk. This may seem a little alarmist — after all, yes, we can vote, and we can choose whether to marry, work, travel, have children, or some combination of all of the above. And yes, women’s graduate school enrollment has risen 40 percent higher than men’s in the last 10 years (National Center for Educational Statistics, 2003). Younger generations can easily accept these freedoms as “business as usual.”

But while we enjoy the spoils of battles past, others are on the horizon. Our degrees may be the same, but women still earn less money than men in the same fields. In 2000, the average yearly difference in salaries for men and women in all professions, trades, and levels of education was approximately $10,700 (NCES, 2003). And let’s not forget that much-talked-about recent comment by Harvard President Lawrence Summers that the innate differences between the sexes might explain why fewer women reach the pinnacle of success in science and math. Yep, we still have a few battles of our own to fight.

Though women today have certain advantages our mothers didn’t have, that doesn’t mean those gains can’t be taken away. While lawmakers continue to bat around the issue of reproductive rights, 22 million single women who were eligible to vote in the 2000 presidential elections didn’t bother (Women’s Voices, Women Vote). Fortunately, the numbers were better in 2004 when unmarried women made up 22.4 percent of the voters. That’s an increase of 7.5 million over the 19 percent reported in 2000 (Women's Voices, Women Vote 2004).  But I wonder how many of those non-voting women, ages 1860, didn’t realize the impact they could have on the legislative process and women’s rights.

Equal value = equal rights = equal responsibilities
"Equal value = equal rights" is the basic tenet behind every mission statement for every human rights organization. The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights states, “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.” That sounds like a feminist, humanitarian view to me.

The ELCA’s social statement (“For Peace in God’s World”)
calls the church — that’s us — to be a “disturbing, reconciling, and serving presence” in the world. As Christians, we understand about being reconciling and serving. But what do we know about being a “disturbing presence”?

“The church is a disturbing presence when it refuses to be silent and instead speaks the truth in times when people shout out, ‘Peace, peace, when there is no peace’ (Jeremiah 6:14)". That global ELCA statement refers to relationships between nations and cultures, but I think it fits perfectly with my definition of a feminist as people who struggle to create a more equal world, for all genders and races.

Young women always have more to see, hear, say, and do to promote feminism. As Christians, we should understand the call for bold, compassionate activism and take action in every area of our lives — at home, at work, at church, and in our communities. The responsibility to make a better world for our daughters and granddaughters falls on us, now. Speak up. Act boldly. Let’s give future generations more victories to celebrate.

Emilie Rommel is 23 years old and working as a writer, waitress, and editorial intern in Seattle, Wash. During an internship with Lutheran Woman Today magazine, she helped develop the content for CAFE.

Back
 

 

Sidebar: Faith Reflections
by Elyse Nelson Winger

For me, faith and feminism are two sides of the same coin. I was raised by parents who celebrated feminism as a cultural and religious movement and I was nurtured in a Christian congregation that planted God’s grace and love and God’s wisdom and word profoundly in my heart.

I first encountered feminist theology and theory as a young woman. It became the catalyst for my calling as a student of Scripture and eventually as a pastor. The following three biblical texts paint the redemptive and moral landscape in which I live and love, minister and pray. As a feminist and Lutheran woman, these biblical texts center me in God’s presence, in the power of the gospel, and in my call to work for justice, mercy, peace, and love in my community and in the world.

So God created humankind in [God’s] image, in the image of God [God] created them; male and female [God] created them. (Genesis 1:27)

This verse is rich and complex, but what I love about it is that both male and female are created in God’s image — which means that God is neither male nor female! God is indeed beyond gender. Yet, both male and female reflect the image of God, which might be better imaged as light, power, love, ground, or source. Genesis tells us something fundamental about all language for God: It is metaphorical. Scholars and theologians have written about symbolic and metaphorical God-language from the beginning, but it is feminist theology in the 20th century that has revitalized this practice in order to free divine language and to re-imagine the wonderful possibilities for naming the divine. (All names are, of course, ultimately limited. The best they can do is point to this reality that we really can only trust and intuit.)

“Which commandment is first of all?” Jesus answered, “The first is, ‘Hear O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one; you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.’ The second is this, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no commandment greater than these. (Mark 12:28b-31)

The whole ministry of Jesus, as we know about it in the Gospels, was one of liberating, redeeming, and radical love. Jesus’ ministry was rebellious and scandalous for many reasons, but one reason that emerges regularly is his inclusion of women. He debated with women, he healed women, he befriended and defended women. Jesus, of course, did not write an autobiography, nor did he tell his disciples to take notes for future reference. So given the patriarchal world in which he lived, it is astounding that women’s experience wound up recorded as much as it was! But central to Jesus’ mission — from birth through death and into a new beginning — was love.

Jesus’ call to love God, love oneself, and love one’s neighbor is the guide for being and doing in the Christian life. Feminist theologians remind us that love of self has been the forgotten part of this set of commandments; countless generations of women have been asked to practice sacrificial love on behalf of families and others but have not been empowered to fully realize and embrace their God-given talents and abilities in order to more fully love their neighbor. It is an understanding of mutual love that feminist theologians have again revitalized and transformed for the sake of faithfulness to the commandment to love God with all our hearts, all our souls, all our minds, and all our strength.

…for in Christ Jesus, you are all children of God through faith. As many of you as were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female; for all of you are one in Christ Jesus. (Galatians 3:26b-28)

If feminism is the radical notion that women are fully people, the gospel is the radical reality that all people are fully children of God. The apostle Paul’s authentic and attributed writings are riddled with contradictions on women’s status before God and the community of believers, yet he is also the most eloquent voice for what it means that Jesus is our Christ. His proclamation in Galatians is the liberating moral and redemptive equalizer for all people. It is the core of feminist theology, and it is representative of the “lens” through which Lutheran Christians read the Scriptures. I cannot imagine one without the other. Paul wrote the churches in Galatia in the midst of strife and conflict over who was a legitimate Christian: was it based in ethnic heritage, adherence to the law, or the ritual of circumcision? To such questions, Paul gave a resounding No! In Christ Jesus we are all one. In Christ Jesus, class, gender, and ethnic differences have no power.

Whenever I read Paul’s words, a pre-baptismal formula for that first generation of believers, I grasp the redeeming power of God-in-Jesus. I sense the radical and transformative promise of God. And I bemoan the fear and brokenness that continued to grip the earliest Christians as they re-instituted patriarchal and legalistic ways of life and expressions of faith. Feminist theology takes this seriously, too, and speaks honestly but hopefully for the continuing promise of God-in-Christ to heal injustice and inequality that continues in the name of God throughout this world.

Rev. Elyse Nelson Winger serves as Pastor for Youth and Family at St. Paul Lutheran Church in Dearborn, Mich. Before this first call, she spent four years in Cairo, Egypt, working and worshipping at St. Andrew's United Church. She and her husband, Stewart, are parents to Catherine and Daniel, who are now four and two.

Subscribe Back Issues Contact us About Us